"There’s a certain inherent irony in needing to use social media in order to broadcast this message to use social media less, right?"
I'm thinking through similar tensions with regard to a print publishing project I'm working on. To what degree is it reasonable to use the internet/screens to promote and distribute physical media that's intended to be a counter-reaction to digital overload? At what point does that become hypocritical? I can't say I have solid answers yet.
Also, the new footnote formatting is looking good on the blog. (Although, in this particular case, I wouldn't have had to scroll to read it.)
"There’s a certain inherent irony in needing to use social media in order to broadcast this message to use social media less, right?"
I'm thinking through similar tensions with regard to a print publishing project I'm working on. To what degree is it reasonable to use the internet/screens to promote and distribute physical media that's intended to be a counter-reaction to digital overload? At what point does that become hypocritical? I can't say I have solid answers yet.
Also, the new footnote formatting is looking good on the blog. (Although, in this particular case, I wouldn't have had to scroll to read it.)